Mumpsimus

I don’t remember when I first encountered the word mumpsimus. But it immediately became one of my favorites. Here’s why.

1.      It’s sharply focused. It means “someone who clings to an error despite all the evidence that the person is wrong.” Mumpsimus zeroes in on a particular situation with sharp, clear definition.

2.      Mumpsimus has a fascinating origin. The word comes from a Catholic priest who mangled the Latin wording in saying the Mass. When he should have said “sumpsimus,” meaning “we have received,” after the Eucharist, he said mumpsimus (which is meaningless) instead. Even though the error was repeatedly pointed out to him, he refused to correct his wording.

3.      When I first encountered mumpsimus I read a story that illustrated its meaning. A mental patient insists that he is dead. His psychiatrist asks him, “Do dead men bleed?” The patient says, “No.” So the doctor takes a needle and pricks the patient’s finger and a drop of blood oozes out. The patient looks at his finger in wonderment and says, “Wow, so dead men do bleed.”

4.      The unusualness of the word leads me to appreciate the richness of the English language. Now and again we meet a new word, which we realize is a perfect fit for a particular need. And we say, “Thank you, English, for giving this to me.”

5.      Finally, there’s the word’s utility. Mumpsimus is perfect for describing people who, for whatever motives, refuse to accept the facts. Perhaps it’s out of habit, like the priest getting the wording wrong. Or maybe it’s easier to cling to an error than make a painful change.

Mumpsimus, I contend, is a word for our times. We should push it to the front in our conversations. Put it in headlines. Shout it from the rooftops. Mumpsimus!

  [300 words]